- 
                Notifications
    
You must be signed in to change notification settings  - Fork 89
 
feat: Updated the reply functionality, modified the related documentation, and added repository management features. #15
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
… response not only message but also other type.
Feature/module optimization
| 
          
 Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThe pull request refactors the notification and GitLab integration systems. It updates documentation by replacing “Reply” with “Response”, removes deprecated reply module files, and introduces a new response architecture with abstract base classes and factories. GitLab integration is enhanced with caching and repository management through new classes. Additionally, review handling and utility functions have been revised, with updates to method signatures and parameter lists across multiple modules. Changes
 Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
    participant WL as Webhook Listener
    participant F as GitlabMergeRequestFetcher
    participant RM as GitlabRepoManager
    participant RE as Review Engine
    participant RR as ReviewResponse
    WL->>F: Instantiate and fetch changes (get_changes(force=False))
    WL->>RM: Create repository manager for project
    WL->>RE: Call handle_merge(F, RM, webhook_info)
    RE->>F: Retrieve changes and info
    RE->>RM: Perform repository operations
    RE->>RR: Generate review response
    RE->>RM: Invoke delete_repo() after threads finish
    sequenceDiagram
    participant RC as Response Controller
    participant RF as Response Factory
    participant DR as DingtalkResponse
    participant GR as GitlabResponse
    participant TR as TemplateResponse
    RC->>RF: Request instance for a response target
    alt Message Type Target
      RF->>DR: Return DingtalkResponse or GitlabResponse instance
    else Other Type Target
      RF->>TR: Return TemplateResponse instance
    end
    RC->>RC: Execute set_state/send_by_other for processing
    Possibly related PRs
 Poem
 📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (21)
 ✨ Finishing Touches
 Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit: 
 Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
 Other keywords and placeholders
 CodeRabbit Configuration File (
 | 
    
Docstrings generation was requested by @vstars1. * #15 (comment) The following files were modified: * `gitlab_integration/gitlab_fetcher.py` * `gitlab_integration/webhook_listener.py` * `response_module/abstract_response.py` * `response_module/response_controller.py` * `response_module/response_factory.py` * `response_module/response_target/msg_response/dingtalk_response.py` * `response_module/response_target/msg_response/gitlab_response.py` * `response_module/response_target/other_type_response/template_response.py` * `review_engine/abstract_handler.py` * `review_engine/handler/default_handler.py` * `review_engine/review_engine.py` * `utils/args_check.py` * `utils/gitlab_parser.py` * `utils/tools.py`
| 
           Note Generated docstrings for this pull request at #33  | 
    
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Documentation
Refactor